From the very wise Mike Rivero…

Posted in politics, theology, visceral gazpaucho on October 28, 2009 by skulz fontaine

 

Freedom, once so embedded in the hearts of all Americans, was surrendered by Americans who believed the sinister men who were determined to enslave them. It was to be for a limited time only, we were assured. But tyrants never relinquish the powers they have gained; they incorporate them into perpetual law. It was done so quietly, so skillfully. A nation will fight when its full liberty is threatened, and the full plot exposed. But if liberties are subdued, little by little, no provocation for a nationwide revolt is given. Like thieves in the night, who move stealthily and without sound, so did the evil men move in your former free government, robbing away the heart and the body of your liberty, denuding your homes of its treasures, slowly stifling your tongues, imperceptibly silencing your press. They invaded the schoolrooms of your children, poisoning and debasing their minds, twisting them to their purposes so that future generations would know nothing of honor or pride and the might of free men. But you were not guiltless.

Hello Again…

Posted in politics, theology, visceral gazpaucho on October 27, 2009 by skulz fontaine

I’ve been off the grid for a month. Yup. Had to move from the Gaza Strip, Utah/Nevada and back to behind the Zion Curtain. Back home once again! Yippee!!

Dang, I had no idea that getting back on the grid was gonna be so freaking difficult. Well believe me, it was and is.

Out in the Gaza Strip, Utah/Nevada we had wifi and getting connections and stuff like that there weren’t no big deal. Yikes! Get back to civilization and you’d think that getting hot-wired back to the net would be a no brainer. Yeah right.

Can’t get no stinking wifi cause in our brammy new urban farm digs, there’s no “line of sight” so we ain’t about to get wifi. Trees! Freaking trees. Here, there, just about everywhere and the freaking trees block the wifi signal from all the nifty wifi providers.

Don’t get me wrong here, I really do like trees. Didn’t have no stinking trees out in the Gaza Strip, Utah/Nevada. Lots of rocks and sage brush and lizards but no trees. Here behind the Zion Curtain, there’s trees everywhere but no wifi.

Hmmm, wifi…trees…chain saws?

Now I am not about advocating a genocide on trees. But dang, I do miss my wifi.

Anyway, it’s good to be back on the grid. Yup. Had me an entire month to think about stuffs and boy did I ever. How come there’s loads of dial up and crappy internet connections in civilization but, out in butt-freaking-desert-nowhere there’s instant wifi and getting back on the grid is cake. Not cake in the civilized Wasatch Front. Oh hell no. Had to wrangle and tangle and just about beg for an internet connection. Yup.

Cause once any cyber-soul is exposed and connected with the wifi, well crap, just about anything else is soooo Neanderthal-ish.

Anyway, gots us a “blazing-fast” brammy new internet connection and presto. Back on the grid.

Go figure, the boondocks is far and away more cyber up to speed so to speak, than the freaking civilized digs where most of the civilized world is dwelling.

Oh well. What is any stuck with what’s available soul supposed to do? Broadband, that’s what any cyber-soul is supposed to do. And broadband we shall.

Back and refreshed and gosh, did I miss anything? Did the Obama pull the troops from Iraq? No? Jeez, why in hell not? Did “they” overhaul health care? Did “they” drag the evil Dick Cheney to meet his fate by guillotine? Did George Bush really take a job as a “motivational” speaker? No shit, really?

You know, sometimes being gone for a month isn’t such a bad thing after all. Nope, not such a bad thing no way no how.

Doesn’t really seem that humanity has made much headway. Nope.

sofa

Posted in politics, theology, visceral gazpaucho on September 28, 2009 by skulz fontaine

Page_1

Afghanisplainin’…their words not mine

Posted in politics, theology, visceral gazpaucho on September 27, 2009 by skulz fontaine

The Potomac River is a physical as well as a figurative divide between the White House and the Pentagon, and occupants of each building often refer to the other address as a slightly foreign place “across the river.”

That gulf is suddenly on display as President Barack Obama contemplates whether to widen the U.S. commitment to the 8-year-old war in Afghanistan, a battle that is losing political and popular support even as it replaces Iraq as the military’s No. 1 priority.

The White House is now uncertain whether to stick with a long-planned military ‘recalibration’ of the war, a hesitance that has stoked new tensions with the Defense Department.

As President Obama weighs sending more troops to Afghanistan, one of the most consequential decisions of his presidency, he has discovered that the military is not monolithic in support of the plan and that some of the civilian advisers he respects most have deep reservations.

The competing advice and concerns fuel a pivotal struggle to shape the president’s thinking about a war that he inherited but may come to define his tenure. Among the most important outside voices has been that of former Secretary of State Colin L. Powell, a retired four-star Army general, who visited Mr. Obama in the Oval Office this month and expressed skepticism that more troops would guarantee success. According to people briefed on the discussion, Mr. Powell reminded the president of his long standing view that military missions should be clearly defined.

Mr. Powell is one of the three people outside the administration, along with Senator John F. Kerry and Senator Jack Reed, considered by White House aides to be most influential in this current debate. All have expressed varying degrees of doubt about the wisdom of sending more forces to Afghanistan.

“The information domain is a battlespace,”… Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal

August had the most fatalities this year for civilians in Afghanistan because of the country’s disputed election, and violence could rise again when the final results are released, a U.N. report warns.

Almost 5.7 million civilian deaths this year were blamed on what the report called pro-government forces, the report said.

“That is why international negotiations with Iran scheduled for October 1 now take on added urgency,” Obama said, referring to an upcoming meeting between key world powers and Iranian negotiators in Geneva.

“The United States is meeting our responsibilities with Russia to reduce our responsibilities and deny opportunity to forsake meaningful dialogue and a disturbing pattern of nuclear pressure by French and British secret negotiations. The international community must now choose integration or isolation.” Obama said in his weekly audio and video address.

Afghanistan’s energy minister attacked more than 100 French tribal elders and civilian bodyguards. Christophe Prazuck claimed responsibility and said deteriorating divisions in Washington are believed to be under pressure to intensify the war.

The United States is to launch airstrikes on the growing divisions in Washington and so sensitive is the subject that when Obama barely mentioned Afghanistan, the Biden camp attacked the nuclear elephant in the room.

“If Obama sends more troops it had better be clear what they are to do,” he said. “A few thousand more boots on the ground may not make much difference, Obama has a really difficult decision to make.”

According to preliminary results, al-Qaeda is trying to capitalize on European recordings released on Friday. Earlier this year there was optimism that tacit co-operation stationed among domestic standing that the Pew Research Centre found that almost two-thirds regarded the US as an enemy.

British officials argue that real-time intelligence would be impossible to even discuss.

So yeah, what they said!

Obama’s LBJ moment

Posted in politics, theology, visceral gazpaucho on September 27, 2009 by skulz fontaine

by Harvey Wasserman

September 27, 2009

Lyndon Johnson was once on the verge of becoming one of America’s greatest presidents.

But with a single wrong turn into Vietnam, LBJ plunged himself and the nation into a ghastly tragedy that still makes us all weep and bleed.

It is NOW! up to us to make sure Barack Obama does not do the same.

Even the corporate media shows signs of understanding the parallels between Vietnam and Afghanistan. So many of us are alive today who remember March, 1965, and all the horror that followed, that there is simply no excuse for allowing this lethal mistake to be repeated.

LBJ inherited the momentum of the New Frontier, the murder of John Kennedy and a huge 1964 electoral mandate. He turned them into a string of civil rights and social welfare victories that still vastly enhance all our lives.

But LBJ also inherited from JFK the beginnings of the war in Vietnam. LBJ’s choice was to escalate or pull out. Recent biographies indicate he had a strong premonition that the war was futile, and that it would do him in. A century from now, historians will still agonize over why he took the plunge anyway.

Likewise, Obama’s most critical decision today does not have to do with health care or energy. There will be bills on both. How much they help or hurt us will be a matter for debate, and for future legislative and legal battles.

But there will be no grey area in Afghanistan. If Obama chains himself to some kind of “victory,” he and what’s left of our nation are doomed.

As in Vietnam, the goal would seem to be to install a regime run by the United States and to “pacify” the country into accepting it. The last foreigner to win like that in Afghanistan was Alexander the Great, about 2300 years ago. Since then the British and Soviets have been among the many to crash and burn in this “graveyard of great powers.”

When LBJ escalated, the draft cards started burning and the protests began in earnest. But it was already too late. By 1968 more than 550,000 American troops were stuck in Southeast Asia and the war raged for yet another 7 years. Millions of Vietnamese and more than 58,000 Americans died. Tens of thousands were terminally traumatized. The toxic human, economic and ecological impacts still ravage both nations.

At some point, LBJ realized what he had done. His extant image is not of a victorious, canonized Lincoln or FDR, but of the exhausted shell of an on-his-way-out president, slumped over a table, listening to a tape from his son-in-law in Vietnam (the photo is by Jack Kightlinger, July 31, 1968).

Obama could all too easily share LBJ’s fate. His mandate to make change is unmistakable and his potential for success is tangible.

But another trap has been set. He has inherited from George W. Bush the beginnings of a horrific quagmire. How he handles it will determine, more than any other decision, his future and that of a deeply wounded nation that still hasn’t recovered from the Southeast Asian catastrophe.

LBJ apparently thought he could not “lose” Vietnam because right wingers would blame him for an ensuing “success of world communism.”

Despite the billions spent in blood and treasure, the last Americans fled from a Saigon rooftop on April 30, 1975. No triumphant wave of global communist aggression ensued. By 1991, due largely to its fiasco in Afghanistan, the Soviet Union and the “world communist conspiracy” definitively disintegrated.

Today’s right-wingers like Condolezza Rice shout that “losing Afghanistan” will mean more terror attacks. It’s utter nonsense. But the warning, carried by the screaming Foxist media, is that unless he drags us all into Southwest Asia, Obama will be held personally responsible for all future mayhem.

Some White House advisors could well be saying the same thing, just as JFK’s “Best and Brightest” warned LBJ not to pull out of Vietnam.

Today General Stanley McChrystal plays the role of William Westmoreland, the prime architect of Vietnam’s military catastrophe. As did Westmoreland, McChrystal is telling the public an Afghan war can be won if only we “stay the course.”

In the 1980s I debated Westmoreland on two college campuses. He told me, with a poker face, that we actually “won the war” by “buying time” for a set of non-communist Southeast Asian dictators (including Singapore’s Lee Kwan Yew, Indonesia’s Suharto and Ferdinand Marcos of the Philippines, all of whom brutalized their people and stuffed billions of dollars into their personal Swiss bank accounts).

If he prevails, General McChrystal may someday have similar things to say.

But we cannot let this happen. Afghanistan cannot be controlled any more than Vietnam could. Effectively fighting terror demands an intelligent, coordinated international effort, not a blundering unilateral plunge into yet another hopeless overseas quagmire.

It also requires a revived prosperity, a winning agenda for social justice, and a Bill of Rights that is honored and in tact.

All of this is in Obama’s reach. But ONLY if he stays out of Aghanistan, and any other military quagmire that might beckon. That would include Iran, where the crisis has internationalized, and is of a very different sort.

Afghanistan, should Obama choose to go there, will be ours and ours alone, with no victory possible and no way out that does not resemble the one from Saigon.

If we had known enough to do it, we should have begun marching against the Vietnam War in 1961, when John Kennedy first committed 11,000 troops there. With a full-blown anti-war movement, perhaps we could have stopped LBJ from committing personal and national suicide in 1965.

Today we have no excuse. This administration is teetering on the edge of catastrophe. A military plunge into Afghanistan would doom Barack Obama and the rest of us to tragedy and impoverishment beyond even LBJ’s worst nightmares.

The moment is now. Health care, yes! Energy and the climate, yes!

But first and foremost: STOP THIS WAR!!!

Harvey Wasserman’s SOLARTOPIA! OUR GREEN-POWERED EARTH is at www.harveywasserman.com, as is HARVEY WASSERMAN’S HISTORY OF THE US. This article was originally published by http://freepress.org.

tick tick tick tick

Posted in politics, theology, visceral gazpaucho on September 26, 2009 by skulz fontaine

Page_1

Pittsbergen!

Posted in politics, theology, visceral gazpaucho on September 24, 2009 by skulz fontaine

Page_1

Twins!

Posted in politics, theology, visceral gazpaucho on September 24, 2009 by skulz fontaine

Page_1

Piggies piggies and venal greedy piggies!

Posted in politics, theology, visceral gazpaucho on September 23, 2009 by skulz fontaine

The following list is from Reuters. Reuters knows all about CEO’s and ass-clowns like that there. The listing pretty much sums up everything that is wrong with Amerikan banking and financial grift. You know, all that in general blood sucking that goes on inside those very plush ‘executive boardrooms’ all across Amerika.

These numbers are staggering. Especially considering that each and every one of the “banks” were given bailout money from the U.S. Treasury. Lloyd ‘the obscene’ Blankfein of Goldman Sacks “earned $42.95 million dollars in compensation for 2008.” Let’s be fair here and call a spade a freaking corrupt duck. 43 million dollars and that is U.S. dollars. Good old Amerikan money. Remember Amerikan money? You might not. Especially if you happen to be one of the “lucky” Amerikans that lost a job recently or sooner or later than you’d have ever thought. Wow, does your unemployment check come even close to 43 million dollars? I’m willing to bet no way in hell.

I have in my pocket directly at present, exactly $6.38 and it’s been there for a while. No, I do not have enough money to leave town and that just bugs the bejesus out of me. Lloyd ‘the obscene’ Blankfein could literally “buy” my town. I’d sell it to him too. He could have the whole depressed place for about one hundred and seventeen dollars. Maintenance and upkeep would be on old Lloyd buddy.

Greed is NOT good. Greed is bullshit and the greedy bastards that get “compensation” such as is listed should be summarily planted at the base of an old school guillotine and introduced to some old fashioned revolutionary outrage. 43 million dollars for why?

The list that Reuters so magnanimously put together, is the tip of one rotting iceberg. A House of Corruption that is protected by the United States government. Cranky Bernanke of the Fed. Turbo Timmy Geithner at Treasury. Barack ‘Holmes’ Obama in my White House. Yeah, the inbred cancer that is the United States Congress is in this protection racket too.

Oh yeah, the top federal employees at the Department of Veterans Affairs are receiving “bonuses.” Yeah, go figure. Hardly germane to banking cheats but, aggravating nonetheless.

Ultimately, the suckers that hold stock and/or equity in these “banks” are responsible for the obscenities lavished on vermin like Blankfein and all his venal buddies. Dumb asses without doubt.

So read it and weep. Weep for the orphans and the widows and your neighbors that probably won’t be your neighbors for much longer. You know, that foreclosure drill. And certainly we shouldn’t forget that Congress bailed out the banks and Wall Street BEFORE they ever got around to working “stimulus packages” for regular Amerikans. Stimulus? Really? That would be where? The Reuters is a descending list from number one to number ten. Ranked and everything. Ewww!

1-Goldman Sachs

Lloyd Blankfein, of Goldman Sachs tops the list. The CEO earned $42.95 million in compensation in 2008.
The top five executives at Goldman received a combined $183.63 million.

2-American Express

K.I. Chenault came in second, earning only slightly less than Blankfein. The CEO earned $42.94 million in compensation in 2008.
The top five executives at American Express received a combined $73.49 million.

3-Citigroup

Vikram Pandit was the third highest compensated CEO. He earned $38.24 million in 2008.
The top five executives at Citigroup received a combined $93.71 million.

4-JPMorgan Chase

James Dimon was the fourth highest compensated CEO. He earned $35.72 million in 2008.
The top five executives at JPMorgan Chase received a combined $76.09 million.

5-State Street

Ronald Logue came in fifth. The CEO earned $24.52 million in compensation in 2008, while the top five executives at State Street received a combined $66.22 million.

6-AIG

AIG’s Martin Sullivan was the sixth highest compensated CEO in 2008, earning $13.27 million.
The top five executives at AIG received $26.94 million.

7-Bank of NY Mellon

Robert Kelly was the seventh highest compensated CEO. He earned $11.96 million in compensation in 2008.
The top five executives at NY Mellon received a combined $41.56 million.

8-Wells Fargo

John Stumpf was next on the list. The Wells Fargo CEO earned $9.04 million in 2008.
The top five executives at Wells Fargo received a combined $32.1 million.

9-Bank of America

BofA’s Kenneth Lewis was the ninth highest compensated CEO. He earned $9 million in 2008.
The top five executives at BofA received a combined $36.47 million.

10-PNC Financial

James Rohr was the tenth highest compensated CEO. He earned $8.55 million in compensation in 2008.
The top five executives at PNC Financial received a combined $24.79 million.

Let me think here, what was it Marie Antoinette said? Oh yeah, “let them eat cake.” Right!!

channeling

Posted in politics, visceral gazpaucho on September 22, 2009 by skulz fontaine

Page_1